Call Now For A Free Consultation:
Call Now For A Free Consultation:
A California police brutality lawyer holds police accountable when officers use excessive force, make unlawful arrests, abuse people in custody, or otherwise violate their rights. At Justin Palmer Law Group, our police brutality lawyers handle these cases in house, from the first evidence preservation letter through trial, and pursue full compensation for the people the system harmed.
Police brutality can change a life in seconds, and the people it happens to are often the least able to fight back alone. Justin A. Palmer built the firm to hold police and public agencies accountable across California, with a primary focus on police misconduct. This page explains what police brutality is, how these cases work, and the specific matters our police brutality lawyers handle. For the firm's broader work, see our main California civil rights lawyer practice.
Call Justin Palmer Law Group today at (310) 658-8935 for a free, confidential consultation with a California police brutality lawyer.
Police brutality is the use of excessive, unnecessary, or unlawful force by law enforcement, along with the broader misconduct that goes with it, such as unlawful arrests, abuse in custody, and the violation of a person's constitutional rights. It is not lawful policing, it is the abuse of police power.
Police are allowed to use force in limited situations, and only as much as a situation reasonably calls for. Brutality begins where that limit ends, when officers beat, shoot, tase, or restrain someone who posed no real threat, or keep using force after a person is already subdued. It also covers the misconduct that surrounds force, including false arrests, unlawful searches, and the mistreatment of people who are locked up.
The common thread is a government officer using the power of the state against someone who did not deserve it. Our California police brutality lawyers treat these cases as the civil rights matters they are, and focus on proving what actually happened rather than accepting the official version.
Police misconduct is the broader term, covering any abuse of police power, from unlawful arrests and illegal searches to dishonest reports and abuse in custody. Police brutality usually refers to the physical side of that misconduct, meaning excessive or unnecessary force. The two overlap constantly.
In everyday use, people say police brutality when they mean an officer hurt someone, and police misconduct when they mean an officer broke the rules in some other way. The law does not draw a hard line between them, and a single incident often involves both, such as a violent arrest that was also unlawful from the start.
For your case, the label matters less than the facts. Our police brutality lawyers look at everything an officer did, the force, the arrest, the search, and the paperwork, and pursue every violation the evidence supports.
Yes. California law gives injured people more than one way to hold police accountable. Most strong cases combine a federal civil rights claim with a claim under California's own civil rights law, and can name the individual officers as well as the city, county, or agency that employed them.
A federal civil rights claim lets you sue a state or local officer for violating your constitutional protections, such as the protection against unreasonable searches and excessive force. A parallel claim under California's civil rights law can add a separate path to recovery in state court. Pursuing both at once gives a jury more than one route to hold the wrongdoer responsible.
The individual officer is usually the most direct target, but the agency behind that officer can also be responsible. A city or county can be held liable when the brutality grew out of its own policy, a longstanding custom, or a failure to train and supervise its officers. Our federal civil rights attorneys investigate the department itself, not just the single encounter, and for people searching for lawyers that sue police departments, the firm handles those claims directly.
It also does not matter that the other side is a large, well funded agency. Cities and counties defend these cases aggressively, but they can be held accountable, and our police brutality lawyers are prepared to take them on. The goal is not just a settlement, but real accountability for what happened.
Yes. Being arrested, or even charged or convicted, does not by itself bar a police brutality claim. Officers are not allowed to use excessive force during an arrest, even a lawful one, and an unlawful beating or shooting is a separate wrong from whatever you were accused of.
Police often defend a case by pointing to the arrest or the charges, as if they excuse everything that happened. They do not. The question in a brutality case is whether the force was reasonable, not whether the person was suspected of something. A valid reason to arrest someone is not a license to hurt them.
If you were charged or are facing a case, it is still worth speaking with a police brutality lawyer, because the criminal side and the civil rights side can affect each other, and our attorneys can help you protect both.
Justin Palmer Law Group handles the full range of police misconduct, from excessive force and wrongful shootings to unlawful arrests, abuse in custody, and deaths at the hands of police. Every case is handled in house, and one team can pursue every overlapping violation from a single incident.
The matters our police brutality lawyers take on include:
Because the firm handles this entire range, a single team can look at everything that happened, not just one part of it. Our police brutality lawyers often find that one incident involves several overlapping violations, and pursuing them together makes for a stronger case.
Police force becomes excessive when it is unreasonable for the situation. Courts weigh how serious the suspected offense was, whether the person posed an immediate threat, and whether they were resisting or fleeing. Force that continues after a person is subdued is often where a case is won.
There is no bright line, but several facts push a use of force toward the excessive side. Using significant force against someone suspected of a minor, nonviolent matter looks very different from a response to a genuine, immediate danger. So does the choice to keep striking, shooting, tasing, or restraining a person who has already stopped resisting or is under control.
Our California police brutality lawyers focus on that moment, and compare what the officer did to what a reasonable officer would have done. That comparison, backed by body camera video, dispatch records, and medical evidence, is the heart of an excessive force case.
The most common forms of excessive force include unnecessary strikes and takedowns, chokeholds and prolonged restraint, taser use, chemical agents like pepper spray, police dog bites, and the use of firearms. Any of these can be excessive when the situation did not call for it.
Some of the most serious cases involve restraint, where officers keep pressure on a person's back or neck after they are handcuffed or no longer resisting, which can cut off breathing. Others involve less lethal tools that are anything but harmless, including tasers, batons, and chemical sprays that cause real injuries when misused. Police dog deployments and firearm use sit at the most dangerous end of the scale.
What ties these together is not the tool, but the timing and the need. Our police brutality lawyers examine whether the force matched the threat, and whether it continued after the threat was gone.
Police brutality causes some of the most serious injuries in any area of law, including gunshot wounds, broken bones, head trauma, taser and restraint injuries, dog bite wounds, and death, along with lasting psychological harm.
The physical injuries our police brutality lawyers see include fractures, nerve damage, gunshot wounds, traumatic brain injuries, injuries from tasers and chemical agents, and the deep puncture wounds left by police dogs. Restraint related injuries, including those from prolonged pressure on the back or neck, can be life threatening. In the most tragic cases, misconduct ends in death, and a family is left to carry both the grief and the financial fallout.
The emotional injuries are just as real. Many people who survive a violent arrest, a shooting, or abuse in custody live afterward with anxiety, depression, and post traumatic stress. A police brutality case can account for those harms too, not only the medical bills, which is why documenting the full picture matters so much.
Because these injuries are often severe and permanent, our police brutality lawyers work with medical providers and, where needed, specialists to document the full extent of the harm, both what a person is dealing with now and what they will face in the years ahead. That complete picture is what a fair recovery has to reflect.
You may be a victim of police misconduct if officers used force that was not necessary, arrested or detained you without a valid reason, denied you medical care in custody, or treated you differently because of who you are. You do not need to be certain before you call.
Some situations that often point to police misconduct include:
If any of these describes what happened to you or a loved one, it is worth talking with a police brutality lawyer, even if you are not sure a law was broken. Our attorneys offer a free consultation so people can learn where they stand before deciding what to do.
Police brutality can happen to anyone, but it falls hardest on certain groups, including people of color, people experiencing a mental health crisis, people with disabilities, unhoused individuals, young people, and those already in custody.
Encounters that turn violent often involve a person who was misread as a threat, or who could not comply the way an officer demanded, whether because of a disability, a language barrier, fear, or a medical or mental health emergency. People who are already marginalized are frequently the ones who pay the price when an officer escalates.
None of that changes the basic rule. Everyone is entitled to be free from excessive force, regardless of who they are or their immigration status, and our police brutality lawyers represent people from every community with that principle in mind.
A police brutality case can seek compensation for medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other harm caused by the misconduct. In cases against individual officers whose conduct was malicious or reckless, punitive damages may also be available. Every case is different, and no honest lawyer can promise a specific result or amount.
The categories of loss a police brutality claim may cover include the cost of medical care, both past and future, and the wages and earning capacity lost when an injury keeps someone from working. They also include the physical pain and the emotional toll of the experience, which in serious cases can be profound and lasting. When the federal side of a case succeeds, the law can also require the losing side to pay the injured person's attorney's fees.
What a case is worth depends on the facts, the injuries, and the conduct involved, and it varies enormously from one matter to the next. Because these cases are usually handled on contingency, our police brutality lawyers can take strong cases without charging clients up front, and are paid from the recovery only if the case succeeds.
Nothing up front. Police brutality cases are handled on a contingency basis, which means you pay no attorney's fees out of pocket, and the firm is paid from the recovery only if your case succeeds. The initial consultation is free.
The contingency model exists for a reason. The people harmed by police are often the least able to pay a lawyer by the hour, and charging them up front would put justice out of reach. By taking strong cases on contingency, our police brutality lawyers make it possible for an ordinary person to stand up to a police department.
When the federal side of a case succeeds, the law can also shift the injured person's attorney's fees onto the losing side. During the free consultation, the firm explains exactly how fees and costs work before you agree to anything.
Qualified immunity is the defense police raise most often. It shields an officer from personal liability unless the right they violated was clearly established at the time. It can end weaker cases early, which is why strong facts, careful pleading, and preserved evidence matter so much.
Qualified immunity asks whether any reasonable officer would have known the conduct was unlawful under existing law. In practice, it gets some cases dismissed before a jury ever hears the facts. Overcoming it takes a clear factual record and a firm that knows how these arguments are made and answered.
That is one more reason moving quickly matters. Body camera footage, dispatch audio, and witness accounts often dismantle an officer's version of events, and they are strongest when preserved early. Our California police brutality lawyers build cases with this defense in mind from the very first day.
The strongest police brutality cases are built on independent evidence, including body camera and dash camera video, bystander and surveillance footage, medical records, dispatch and use of force records, and witness accounts. That evidence often tells a very different story than the arrest report.
Video is frequently the turning point, because it captures what officers did rather than what they later wrote. Medical records document the injuries and connect them to the force used. Agency records, including use of force reports, training materials, and an officer's history, can reveal a pattern that a single incident would hide.
The challenge is that much of this evidence sits in the hands of the agency at fault, and some of it disappears on a schedule. Our police brutality lawyers move quickly to demand and preserve it, because a case is only as strong as the proof behind it.
Get medical care, photograph every injury, save your clothing, write down everything you remember while it is fresh, gather witness contact information, and ask a lawyer to send a written notice preserving body camera footage. Then speak with a police brutality lawyer before any deadline runs.
The first days after a violent encounter often decide what you can prove later. Photograph every visible injury in good light, and again over the following days as bruising develops. Keep any torn or bloodstained clothing in a paper bag. Write a dated account of what happened, including the officers, badge numbers, and patrol car numbers you can recall, and collect contact information for anyone who saw it or recorded it.
Just as important, do not give a recorded statement to internal affairs or sign anything from an agency or its insurer before speaking with counsel. Body camera and agency video can be erased under routine retention schedules, sometimes within weeks, so a written preservation request sent early can be the difference between having that evidence and losing it. Our police brutality lawyers handle these preservation steps as a routine first move.
In California, a claim against a city, county, or other public agency generally must begin with a written government claim filed within six months of the incident. Federal civil rights claims usually carry a longer window of about two years. The two deadlines run at the same time, and missing the shorter one can bar part of your case.
The six month government claim deadline surprises almost everyone. If your case is against a California city police department, a county sheriff's office, or another public agency, the state side of your claim can be lost if that written claim is not filed in time. The clock starts on the date of the incident, not on the date you recovered or first spoke with a lawyer.
The federal deadline is generally longer, but treating it as a reason to wait is a mistake. Evidence disappears, witnesses move, and footage gets overwritten long before either deadline arrives. Talking with a California police brutality lawyer within weeks of the incident, not months, protects both your evidence and your right to file.
Justin Palmer Law Group handles police brutality cases in stages, starting with fast evidence preservation and a full investigation, then filing the right claims on time, negotiating from a position of strength, and taking the case to trial when the agency refuses to be fair. The firm keeps these cases in house from start to finish.
The first move is preservation and investigation. Our police brutality lawyers send preservation letters, request body camera and agency records, gather medical documentation, and locate witnesses while memories are fresh. Moving fast at this stage often determines what evidence still exists later.
Next comes the claim itself. The team files the required government claim within the short state deadline and prepares the federal civil rights case, naming the officers, the supporting officers who failed to intervene, and the agency where the facts support it. From there, our California police brutality lawyers press the case through negotiation, and when a fair resolution is not offered, through litigation and trial. Throughout, clients are kept informed and involved, because it is their case and their story.
Justin Palmer Law Group serves clients throughout California, with a strong presence across Southern California, including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Inglewood, and the surrounding counties. Distance is rarely a barrier, because much of a case is built through records, investigation, and direct communication with the client.
Our police brutality lawyers regularly handle matters across the region and beyond, including:
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.