Call Now For A Free Consultation:
Call Now For A Free Consultation:
You have real rights after a wrongful police shooting in California, even when the officer claims the shooting was justified. State and federal civil rights laws give surviving family members the power to sue for damages and to demand public accountability.
Every June, the country marks National Gun Violence Awareness Day. People wear orange to remember loved ones killed by gun violence. For many California families, that includes someone shot by a police officer. A son shot during a traffic stop in Long Beach. A daughter killed during a welfare check in Inglewood. A father was killed in a stairwell when officers responded to the wrong address.
If a loved one has been shot by police, the first 30 days matter the most. Body cam footage can be deleted or fought over. Witnesses move. Surveillance video from nearby businesses gets overwritten on a loop, sometimes in just a few days. The deadline to put California on notice of a claim against a public agency is short.
This post walks through the law that applies and who can sue. It covers how long you have, what damages are on the table, and what evidence makes the difference. Plain language. No false promises.
A police shooting is wrongful when the officer uses deadly force in a situation where deadly force is not legally necessary. California raised that bar a few years ago. Officers can now use lethal force only to stop an imminent threat of death or serious injury. They must also have no reasonable alternative.
That is a higher standard than the old "reasonable officer" rule. It means an officer cannot shoot just because they felt afraid. A court can ask whether the officer tried other tactics first. A court can also look at what the officer did to create the situation in the first place.
A shooting can be wrongful for many reasons. The person was not armed. The person was running away. The person posed no threat to anyone. The officers were at the wrong address. The officer fired without warning. Each fact matters.
Call us 24/7 at (310) 658-8935 to speak with a California police brutality lawyer, or reach out online to start your free case review.
You can sue under both California law and federal civil rights law. They run side by side. Each one offers different remedies.
The federal civil rights statute lets you sue a police officer for violating the U.S. Constitution. A wrongful shooting is a violation of the protection against unreasonable seizure. The case is filed in federal court. Successful plaintiffs can recover compensation for the loss, punitive damages against the officer personally, and a separate award of attorney's fees from the government.
California's Bane Act is the state version. It lets you sue when a public officer uses or threatens violence to interfere with your civil rights. The Bane Act also covers attorneys' fees and allows additional damages in some cases. We use it alongside the federal claim because state courts can offer faster timelines and a different jury pool than federal courts.
There are also state law claims like battery, negligence, and wrongful death. Surviving family members usually file all of these together.
Surviving spouses, registered domestic partners, and children of the deceased can file. So can parents in many cases. Siblings can in some.
California's wrongful death rules set the order. If the person killed has no spouse or children, the parents step into the role. If there are no parents either, certain other family members may have standing.
A separate type of claim, called a survival action, runs concurrently. It compensates the estate for the pain and suffering the loved one experienced before they died. That award goes to the estate and is later distributed to heirs.
In federal civil rights cases, surviving family members can also sue for their own constitutional injury. The loss of the parent-child relationship is recognized as a constitutional harm. Spouses and parents have similar standing in many cases.
Short version: you have six months to put the public agency on notice, and you have two years to file the federal lawsuit. Both clocks run from the day of the shooting.
The six-month rule is called the government claim deadline. You have to file a written claim with the agency first. That applies to cities, counties, and sheriff's departments. Only then can you sue in state court. Miss this deadline, and the state usually claims you die. There are narrow grounds to request a late filing. The safer path is to file on time.
The two-year clock is for the federal civil rights claim. This claim does not require a government claim filing because it is a federal action. But the two-year limit still applies in California for adult plaintiffs. Special rules apply when the person killed was a minor.
Bottom line: do not wait. Six months pass faster than you think when a family is grieving and trying to get answers from a department that is not talking.
Damages in a wrongful police shooting case fall into a few groups. Each one is proved with different evidence.
We never quote a dollar figure to a family before we know the facts. What a case is worth depends on many factors. The strength of the evidence and the available video matter. So does the officer's record, the family's losses, and the venue. Anyone who promises a number is not being honest.
Evidence builds and disappears fast. The first 30 days are the most important window.
Body cam footage is the single most important piece of evidence. California law requires departments to release certain body-cam footage after a serious use of force, but the timeline can stretch for months. Our civil rights lawyers send preservation letters the same day a family hires us. Some departments still try to claim the footage was lost, damaged, or never recorded.
Dash cam footage matters when the shooting happened during a traffic stop or pursuit. So does private surveillance video from nearby homes, businesses, and gas stations. We send investigators door-to-door to pull video before it loops over.
Witness statements need to be locked in early. Memories fade. Some witnesses move and become hard to find. Some are themselves afraid of the police. A trained civil rights investigator knows how to approach them and how to document what they saw.
Internal department records are part of the picture, too. Past complaints against the same officer. Past lawsuits. Past training failures. We pursue all of it through the lawsuit, and we use public records laws when we can.
Qualified immunity is the doctrine officers raise to try to get a federal civil rights case thrown out. It says officers cannot be sued unless they violated a right that was clearly established at the time of the shooting.
That sounds like a high wall. But courts have ruled many times against it. Shooting an unarmed person who poses no threat is a clearly established violation. Shooting a person who is running away unarmed is a clearly established violation. Shooting through a closed door without warning is a clearly established violation.
The Bane Act does not include qualified immunity as a defense. That is one of the main reasons our civil rights lawyers file both federal and state claims. If the federal case faces a tough qualified immunity ruling, the state case keeps moving.
Our civil rights lawyers build the record on these issues from day one. We brief the law early. We tie the facts to existing court rulings. We push the case toward a jury when the facts support it.
The first call to our office is free and confidential. There are no upfront costs or fees unless we recover compensation for the family. The phone is answered at any time of day or night. A police shooting does not wait for office hours.
Our civil rights lawyers act fast. We send preservation letters within hours. We file public records requests for body-cam and dash-cam footage. We coordinate with a trained investigator to find and document witnesses. We bring in forensic doctors and ballistics analysts when the cause of death or the trajectory of a bullet needs a closer look.
We file the government claim before the six-month deadline. We prepare the federal civil rights complaint at the same time. We push for early production of the officer's personnel file and discipline history. We make sure the family always knows where the case stands.
Justin A. Palmer founded the firm as a civil rights and personal injury practice. We take cases against California police agencies and other government defendants because families need someone willing to do this work.
Write down everything you remember. Names, badge numbers, the time, the place, what was said. Save every voicemail. Save every text. Save every news story link about the shooting.
Get the names and phone numbers of any witnesses, including neighbors who came outside. Take photos of the scene, the cars, the lighting at the time of day the shooting happened. Do not clean anything that might be evidence.
Do not give a recorded statement to the department or to the city's risk management office. Talk to a civil rights lawyer first. What you say in those early calls can be used later. It is almost never in the family's interest to give that interview before a civil rights lawyer does.
Justin Palmer Law Group represents California families after wrongful police shootings. The consultation is free, the phone is answered any time, and you pay nothing unless we recover for the family.
Call us 24/7 at (310) 658-8935 to speak with a California police brutality lawyer, or reach out online to start your free case review.
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.